Friday, July 29, 2022


UUPs and Transmedium UFOs? (Canadian Edition)

With the announcement of the new rechristened Pentagon UAP program as the “All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO),” there is apparent support for observations of UFOs or UAPs that seem to enter or exit bodies of water.

The Pentagon statement about the AARO notes specifically:

The US’s Department of Defence (DOD) has launched a new “all-domain anomaly resolution office” (AARO) – a rebrand and widening of its UFO investigations office which will now also assess reports of not just flying saucers but also “anomalous, unidentified space, airborne, submerged and transmedium objects.”


Now, these kinds of UFOs are not at all new in some ways, as there have always been reports of UFOs seen moving over lakes or oceans and dropping into them (rarely out of them). In most cases, these have been explained as bolides or meteors with apparent downward trajectories which are coincident with bodies of water. Sometimes, UFOs are seen at or near the surface of a lake or the ocean and then disappear, suggesting to an observer that the object descended into the water. Many “orb” reports from the south side of Lake Ontario looking north towards Toronto, for example, involve lights that are actually on aircraft landing at Billy Bishop Airport along the waterfront, or else on ships or boats.

Singling them out by calling these UFOs “transmedium” is a bit of a stretch, but this is certainly related to observations of UAP seen by US Navy personnel and reported widely on UFO fansites. Most notable of these is Jeremy Corbell’s documentation of a spherical UAP that seemed to enter the ocean off San Diego in 2019, recorded on video by sailors on the USS Omaha:

The US Navy photographed and filmed “spherical” shaped UFOs and advanced transmedium vehicles… This footage was filmed in the CIC (Combat Information Center) of the USS Omaha on July 15th 2019 in a warning area off San Diego. This footage depicts a UAP event series that reached a crescendo with one of the unknown targets entering the water. No wreckage found. None of the unknown craft were recovered.

Better-known is the encounter by pilots flying from the USS Princeton near the same area in 2004:

What the pilots saw as they came within about a mile of the target was a white, featureless object—no wings, engines, control surfaces, or surface features—that measured roughly 45 feet long and looked like a flying Tic Tac. Commander David ‘Sex’ Fravor, the commanding officer of VFA-41 and the pilot in the lead Super Hornet that day, noted that the outer shell of the craft looked like a ‘whiteboard.’ The object was low over the water which was frothing underneath. According to Fravor, it looked almost like the water was ‘boiling’ below the object, which was moving above the water ‘like a Harrier.’ It then started moving at about 500 knots at 500 to 1,000 feet over the ocean.

But apart from these few military reports, transmedium UFOs are relatively rare in the literature, despite some very thorough publications devoted to documenting water-related UFO cases. [Most notably, this includes Carl Feindt’s remarkable UFOs and Water: Physical Effects of UFOs on Water Through Accounts by Eyewitnesses (2016).]

It’s tempting to think (as some have suggested) that the inclusion of the actual term transmedium as a specific kind of UFO is related to the influence of some UAP political insiders and not a reflection of significant numbers of Unidentified Underwater Phenomena (UUP) reports. There are some claims that UUP have been detected by military sensors and submariners, which shouldn’t come as any surprise given the many possible objects detectable on sonar and other devices. A small percentage of UUP—like UFOs—will be unexplained.

The other interesting thing to note about the AARO inclusion of “watery” UFOs in its mandate is that, as with airborne or spaceborne UAPs, it’s primarily interested in military reports. As yet, we have not seen any plan for AARO (or even its predecessor AATIP) to collect civilian UFO reports. That still seems to be left to civilian groups and organizations.

Further, the Pentagon seems to be encouraging military personnel to come forward without fear of reprimand or ridicule, with a kind of whistleblower policy being instituted. This is a good thing.

Of note, however, is that there is already a system in place for mariners and military ship personnel to report UAP.

In Canada.

There is currently on the books a regulation as part of the Canadian Coast Guard’s Notices to Mariners that mandates a procedure for reporting “Vital Intelligence Sightings” to military authorities. This is in parallel with Communications Instructions for Reporting Vital Intelligence Sightings (CIRVIS) that is part of the procedure manual for Canadian aviators and is also in force for American air personnel.

Merchant Intelligence (MERINT) reports are required by the Department of National Defence to “extend the early warning coverage for the defence of the North American continent… during peacetime.”

In the Notices to Mariners, Section F: National Defence – Military Notices, number 36, paragraph 3 states:

MERINT reports should be made under the following circumstances:

(a)   Immediately upon a vital intelligence sighting

And what falls under the category of a vital intelligence sighting?

All airborne and waterborne objects which appear to be hostile, suspicious or unidentified should be reported.

(a) The following are examples:

(i) Guided missiles.

(ii) Unidentified flying objects.

(iii) Submarines.

(iv) Surface warship positively identified as not Canadian or U.S.

(v) Aircraft or contrails (vapour trails made by high flying aircraft) which appear to be directed against Canada, the U.S., their territories or possessions.

Okay, so (i) is a no-brainer. Report any guided missile that’s zooming overhead. Gotcha.

And if you’re fishing from your houseboat and a gunship with a with an unusual flag comes alongside or a submarine surfaces next to you, that falls under (iii) or (iv).

Number (v) is best left to chemtrail conspiracists.

But it’s number (ii) that’s interesting. It specifically refers to UFOs (and not UAPs, sorry – not sorry).

The Canadian Department of National Defence requires all mariners and boaters to keep an eye out for UFOs and tell the Coast Guard about them:

MERINT messages should be transmitted to the nearest or most convenient Canadian or U.S. Government coast station.


In the event a report cannot be made by radio, the master should report the details of the MERINT sighting to the appropriate Canadian or U.S. consular or military authority immediately upon arrival in port. Such reports should be made by the quickest available means.

Note that this isn’t just a Coast Guard thing. The MERINT regulations mention consular or military authorities as well. And not just Canadian authorities, but American offices as well.

As of 2020, the most recent Notices to Mariners, the Canadian government is cooperating with American military offices to allow both civilian and enlisted personnel to report UFOs. This has not been mentioned in any of the recent Pentagon statements about UAP.

As I’ve recommended many times before, you should look to Canada for UFO research and report data.  


Saturday, March 19, 2022


290 Canadian UFO documents released (sort of)


Headlines on #ufotwitter and some news outlets absolutely gushed with the news that Vice reporter and CTV journalist Daniel Otis had received 290 documents from the Canadian government as a result of his Access to Information (ATI) request (Canada's version of the American FOIA).

Otis has been doing a phenomenal job of filing requests and is the Canadian version of John Greenewald, spending hundreds of dollars and man-hours seeking UFO docs from the Canadian government. His success at obtaining previously-unreleased records about UFO sightings in Canada has been pretty darned good.

[Aside: in Canada, they are indeed called UFO, not UAP, despite what most people would like to think. Transport Canada has a category clearly labeled UFO, and report forms used by the Canadian Department of National Defence read "UFO Report" at the top of the page.]

Otis and I have been corresponding for a while now, ever since he started his interest in UFOs in 2020 and his first Vice articles appeared. He is also in contact with other ufologists and UFO fans, as well as individuals within media and government. He is well-situated to dig into matters relating to UFO phenomena.

He was able to get some very interesting documents and statements from spokespersons for National Defence as well as Transport Canada, obtaining details on how UFO reports are dealt with and collected in Canada. (And, incidentally, I am mentioned often in his Vice article, once even calling me "Canada's Point Man" for UFOs.)

His latest Vice article was very curious, because when he told me it was coming out and that he had hundreds of UFO docs from the government, I was puzzled. He had told me that I was mentioned in some of the documents, which made sense, because I have been receiving UFO reports from DND and other government sources since the year 2000. I have several hundred on file since that time, so the number 290 seemed strange. It should either be much greater or much smaller.

Otis made the entire set of documents he received available on the Vice website, much to the delight of UFO fans, many of whom heralded this as Disclosure. It's admirable that he made them all available for scrutiny.

But Disclosure, it ain't.

I took a hard look at the set of docs, and found an interesting breakdown. Out of 290 pages of documents, there were reports on 116 incidents. Many had more than one page, leading to the inflated number. Also, the last 30 pages of the set of documents was a list of about 500 Civil Aviation Daily Occurrence Reports (CADORS) compiled by Transport Canada and Nav Canada (the Canadian versions of the American FAA).

CADORS include everything from blown tires in landing to drunken passengers on flights, to errors in communication between pilots and air traffic controllers. There are between 50 to 100 such incidents reported each day in Canada. A small number are categorized as: Weather balloon, meteor, rocket, CIRVIS/UFO." These were what comprised the 500ish cases in the list. And yes, most were the first three in the description.

But within that list are indeed some strange reports of pilot sightings of UFOs that don't seem to have simple explanations. I have been including these reports every year in the annual Canadian UFO Survey, which analyses national UFO case data. And more recently, as new ones have been reported, I have been posting them to Facebook, and other social networks such as #ufotwitter, along with Otis and others who find the incidents in the daily lists of Transport Canada CADORS.

So the first red flag is that the incidents in this list had already been made public in a number of ways dating back to the year 2000. 

The other 116 reports? Of those, all except 13 were the actual CADORS reports. They were already in the list of CADORS later in the set of documents.

Also, the earliest of these was from 2009, so the reports covered only about a dozen years, not 20 years. The 13 reports were military files, such as Communications Instructions for Reporting Vital Intelligence Sightings (CIRVIS), a category that dates back to JANAP 146, a policy created in 1953 directing both Canadian and American pilots to report all "unidentified flying objects." I had already made the existence of most of these public, even at some UFO conferences and public presentations, on slides.

Finally, it has to be noted that, like all collections of UFO reports, the vast majority have probable explanations, and don't contain any proof that UFOs are alien spacecraft (as a significant number of UFO fans believe).

With this examination of the 290 documents, it is obvious this wasn't Disclosure (or even disclosure).

It was definitely interesting, however, because Otis' ATI request for UFO documents generated this set of files that were indeed categorized as UFOs by the Canadian government. Furthermore, many of these were reports of observations by pilots or air traffic controllers (or radar operators), who can be considered pretty good observers. (There were also quite a few reports from citizens who reported UFOs to airports; I have described how the average person can report UFOs to Transport Canada in a recent blog.)

The reaction from hardcore UFO cans and zealots was fairly predictable, however. "Why hasn't the mainstream media reported on this?" "Why didn't this get more attention from anyone?"

The reason is, of course, because the "release" of the 290 documents wasn't a release, but a response to a specific ATI request, so it wasn't disclosure of anything. Plus, the reports released don't show anything other than objects were seen by pilots and non-pilots, and most of these objects had explanations. Further, even the truly unidentified ones don't explicitly implicate aliens - or even a foreign power operating over North America.

That's not to say that some cases weren't curious. 

For example, CADORS case 2017P1732 (which had been made public that same year), noted that just north of Prince Rupert, BC, at 3:40 pm local time on September 3, 2017: 

A concerned citizen reported a black object the size and shape of a rugby ball moved quickly west to east above their house, less than 100 feet above the ground. Area control centre (ACC) Shift Manager was advised. 

There was even an update on file: 

2017-09-14: UPDATE: CIRVIS REPORT from CZVR: During daylight hours and as a ground visual, a black volleyball sized oblong object was seen near East Digby Island. The object was moving west to east and moving fast enough to make sound. The object was moving straight with no manoeuvres.

Both the CADORS and the CIRVIS report were provided to Otis, one of the few instances where that was so.

A black Tic-Tac? Go figure.

Even better in my opinion was CADORS 2014O0421, which happened on March 3, 2014, at about 4 pm local time.

At approximately 2100Z, a Piper PA-23-250 on a local flight from Burlington, ON (CZBA) was outbound (north eastbound) on the simulated LOC 30 approach at three thousand feet. When crossing the Binbrook non-directional beacon (NDB) (5.7 nm from CYHM airport), the pilot reported seeing an object pass under them at approximately 2,900 ft westbound, jelly bean shaped, green in colour and about 3 feet in diameter. The pilot stated that it was not a balloon and that if it were a balloon it would have been going in the same direction as [the plane] as the wind direction was 300 at 15 knots. The object was going in the opposite direction to the wind.

I guess that Tic-Tacs can be green as well as black or white. (Although three feet in size is much smaller than the one that buzzed the jets in California.)

Otis has been posting many of these CADORS cases and associated documents on social media for more than a year, and UFO fans have been digging them.

I've been posting about Canadian government UFO docs (and posting the docs themselves) for decades. I even have showed slides of them to audiences at some UFO conventions and other public meetings, as noted above.

Like this one, from June 5, 2009.

Or this one, seen and reported by an experienced meteorologist in Canada's Far North, also in 2009:

The fact is that there is considerable documentation that the Canadian government has information on unidentified flying objects seen by pilots and other good observers.

Daniel Otis has done good work in making this known to adherents of ufology.


Sunday, January 30, 2022


Where do I report my UFO sighting?


Where do I report my UFO sighting?


So, you think you’ve seen a UFO! Congratulations!

Now what?

Well, you’ve joined a somewhat exclusive club. Surveys and statistical studies have suggested that one out of every ten North Americans has seen a UFO. There are reports on record from a very broad spectrum of people, from pilots to farmers, and from children to seniors, all genders, from coast to coast to coast (to coast).

The difference is that this data comes from UFO reports, and you haven’t reported your sighting yet.

Other surveys have shown that only one in ten of all UFO witnesses will ever bother to make a formal report of a sighting, so that means you have to decide if you want to file one or not.

But how? And to whom, or which organization?

Unfortunately, there isn’t one central location to report a UFO. This, despite the apparent huge amount of interest and publicity and media attention to the subject. But the fundamental basis for ufology is the UFO report itself, and there’s not much being done to gather this actual data, upon which is built all the speculation concerning UAP propulsion, physical composition, and (by ET believers) the aliens themselves.

I found that Googling “How do I report a UFO” generates five answers.

The first is “UFO Daddy”, which directs you to the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON), a private organization of UFO fans that trains teams of Field Investigators (FIs) to investigate your UFO sighting.

The second hit is a UFO FAQ on HubPages, which first notes: “According to NASA’s web page, you should report UFO sightings to 911, or your local emergency number. However, there is no official government agency that is responsible for investigating sightings.” However, the web page in question has nothing to do with UFOs and the original must have been deleted long ago. Curiously, if you search for “UFO” on that NASA web page, you get one link that is to an explanation about how an unusual object photographed during Apollo 16 was actually a long boom and floodlight attached to the spacecraft. But with no relevance to a typical UFO sighting.

The other three answers are garbage UFO sites with general comments from readers.

It seems like the first option is the best: MUFON. If you go to its website, you can find a link to a page for reporting a UFO to them.


Oh, wait, what about the suggestion to reporting UFO sightings to 911? That’s a very reasonable possibility. After all, that way you can lodge a formal complaint and you know that police do have investigators that will do something about it. Maybe you should do that first.

Or not. Because calling 911 about a UFO sighting may take an emergency responder away from a call about a medical emergency or a heinous crime in progress. No, don’t do that.

That site also noted that “there is no official government agency that is responsible for investigating sightings.”

But haven’t we heard in the media and news recently that there is such an agency? Wouldn’t it be better to report a UFO sighting to an official body?

I guess so, but how, exactly? NASA seems uninterested, despite what we found. What about the air force?

The USAF website says the following: “Persons wishing to report UFO sightings should be advised to contact local law enforcement agencies.”

That’s funny. I thought the USAF had a task force to investigate UFOs (or UAPs, as they are called now, apparently).

Oh, it’s the US Navy is going to be investigating UFOs. But there’s no indication of how they will collecting UFO or UAP data, nor how an average citizen can report a sighting. In fact, Pentagon’s Task Force on UAPs issued its first report and noted that only a relative handful of military UAP sightings were studied. (Only 144, to be exact.) Its report noted that its investigation: “…remains limited to USG reporting.”

So although the Department of Defense is going to be studying UFO/UAP reports to see if any are a threat to national security, they aren’t interested in your personal sighting. But you might try anyway, by emailing the USAF with your sighting details. Otherwise, maybe do what the USAF suggests, and report your sighting to your local police.

Good luck with that.

Okay, what about other UFO groups and organizations?

Absolutely. Many are very eager to get your sighting reports. Many have websites with online forms to fill out.

A significant one is the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC), based in Washington State. They get many hundreds of cases each year reported to them, and their info is open to the public, unlike MUFON, whose case reports are private. So if you want others to know what you saw, NUFORC is a good option.

Another is UFOs Northwest, originally devoted to the American Northwest, but now accepting reports from all around the world. They also post details of everyone’s UFO sightings and allow for comments and letters.

A group with a good website is UFO Hunters. They are exactly what they say they are, a group of people dedicated to searching for UFOs, and readily acknowledge the work of NUFORC and MUFON. UFO Hunters has an added bonus of providing an interactive map that shows UFO activity around the world, and has a searchable index.

The group with historically the best record is the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS). It was the creation of the “Grandfather of Ufology,” Dr. J. Allen Hynek, who worked with the USAF and then went rogue, saying that the USAF ignored all the good cases.

Of course, other countries have their own UFO groups and organizations, all of which accept UFO sighting reports. The largest of these is the British UFO Research Association (BUFORA). In Italy, there’s the Centro Italiano Studi Ufologici (CISU), and they have an online UFO report form you can email to them. A French group, Groupe d'Études et d'Informations sur les Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non-identifiés (GEIPAN), is very active and has an interactive website where you can not only report your UFO sighting, but also triage it, so you might be able to yourself identify what you saw. There are other groups around the world, and you can search for them online. (Here’s what Wikipedia says.)

In North America, both Canada and Mexico also have groups that investigate UFOs. Canada is particularly of interest, because not only are there civilian UFO groups, but its government also has taken an interest in UFOs.

The Canadian UFO Survey has been cataloguing UFO sightings there for more than 30 years. An online web form can send them your report if you see one in Canada. There’s a second form to reach them on a podcast website.

The Canadian UFO Survey includes sightings reported to a host of other groups in Canada, such as UFOBC, Quebec based groups such as Groupe d’assistance et de recherche sur les phénomènes aérospatiaux non-identifiés (GARPAN) and Association Québécoise d’Ufologie (AQU), plus Canadian cases reported to MUFON and NUFORC.

The Canadian UFO Survey also includes reports of UFOs made to the Canadian government. This includes Transport Canada, the Canadian equivalent of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Pilots are required to report UFOs as per “AIP CANADA Part 2 - Enroute (ENR)”:

“Communication Instructions for Reporting Vital Intelligence Sightings (CIRVIS) reports should be made immediately upon a vital intelligence sighting of any airborne and ground objects or activities that appear to be hostile, suspicious, unidentified or engaged in possible illegal smuggling activity. Examples of events requiring CIRVIS reports are: unidentified flying objects…” ( (Retrieved 29 January 2022)

In addition to pilots, civilians have been known to file UFO reports as “Aviation Incidents,” and there is separate form for drone incidents. (Drones have been blamed for many UFO sightings.) These incident reports usually are available as Civil Aviation Daily Occurrence Reporting System (CADORS). The justification for reporting UFOs is broadly interpreted as: “Any occurrence which may generate a high degree of public interest or concern or could be of direct interest to specific foreign air authorities.”

In regard to the FAA in the USA, all its website says regarding reports of UFOs is that: “Persons wanting to report UFO/unexplained phenomena activity should contact a UFO/ unexplained phenomena reporting data collection center, such as the National UFO Reporting Center, etc.” and “If concern is expressed that life or property might be endangered, report the activity to the local law enforcement department.” The FAA equivalent to the Transport Canada incident report seems to be FAA 8020-23. (You can report a drone to the FAA too.)

It is interesting to note that the FAA Order 8020.11D has a section on “Spacecraft incidents," which can be investigated under Chapter 7(8)e, noting that: “the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (AST) has the authority to conduct independent investigations parallel to an NTSB investigation, including, but not limited to the following: (1) Accidents not investigated by the NTSB. (2) Incidents or other identified mishaps.” So I suppose technically, the FAA could investigate UFO reports under this Order.

But I digress.

Finally, one has to acknowledge that social media is possibly the best way to share your UFO sighting with others. In theory, it’s the most efficient; if all states and provinces had their own separate Facebook groups for reporting UFOs, it would be a tremendous boost to UFO/UAP investigations. Unfortunately, UFO information on social media is in a state akin to the Wild West, with disparate groups that have conflicting agendas controlling the discourse.

Yet, one can find pockets of interactions that have useful information.

In Canada, for example, there are Facebook groups where witnesses in specific provinces report their sightings and others are able to comment (and criticize and flame, unfortunately). The same is true of most US States.

You can find many, many UFO videos posted on YouTube (just search for them), but beware of misinformation and sensational channels that exploit believers.

Possible one of the better sources of UFO info on social media is Reddit, where subreddits on specific UFO topics can provide good insight. In fact, the subreddit lists some way to report your UFO sighting, including: the National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena (NARCAP) (which has info for pilots to report their UFO sightings); MUFON; The Black Vault; and Aerial Phenomena Investigations (API), which also accepts UFO sighting reports. (In fact, API notes that: “It’s fine to report your sighting to NUFORC, but raw, uninvestigated sightings have very little weight on their own.”)

The other organization mentioned, The Black Vault, is a site created by UFO researcher John Greenewald, whose primary interest is retrieving government documents on various topics, many of which are UFO-related. Nevertheless, his site has a link for reporting UFO sightings, conducted by TBV Investigations (operated by Tiffany Hahn, a licenced private investigator with an interest in the paranormal.)

In other social media, there are some UFO groups and researchers on Twitter, such as the aforementioned UFO Hunters, among many others. Also, many people post Tweets with the hashtag #ufotwitter, which has dozens and dozens of Tweets posted every day.

One thing to consider is that despite the many groups mentioned so far that have links to UFO reporting forms and mechanisms, some may not have the resources or capabilities to investigate UFO reports. You may live hundreds or thousands of miles away from where a group’s investigators live, and how would they visit you and examine where the UFO was seen or landed?

Finally, it’s worth noting that if you see a UFO and report it, your observation may not be considered as useful data for “solving the UFO mystery” at all. The UAPTF doesn’t seem to be interested in civilian UFO reports, just those experienced by military personnel and perhaps recorded by radar and video. The recently formed Galileo Project, which includes a lot of scientists who are interested in the UFO phenomenon, is not interested in the average UFO report. Its founder has been quoted as saying that: “...the best sightings would be those that did not involve humans. He wanted instruments to collect the data without human interaction. He wanted to remove errors that were often generated by human perception and human bias.”

So there you have it. It’s not that there are no ways to report your UFO sighting – it’s that there are so many options. Do you want your report to go the government for its UFO/UAP study? Do you want your report to go to a private UFO group? Do you want to share your UFO/UAP experience with others? MUFON has recently made its database completely closed to non-subscribers, so it’s not open for public viewing, but maybe it’s worth it for you to open your wallet or purse and join them in their quest to understand UFOs. NUFORC might be a good bet for sharing your UFO experience and allowing others to read about what you’ve seen, if that’s your goal.

Maybe you should take care in observing the UFO, noting all relevant details such as those listed on UFO reporting forms, and hang onto your information. Perhaps start a “UFO diary” to record your sighting(s).

Regardless of what you decide, you’re not alone. (No, I’m not necessarily talking about aliens visiting Earth.) Polls and studies have suggested there are at least 35 million people in the United States alone who believe they have seen a UFO.

It’s now up to you.

[NB: All URLs were live as of January 29, 2022. Special thanks for Curt Collins and Ralph Howard for their comments and insight. Thanks also to Mark Rodeghier and Isaac Koi.]


Monday, January 24, 2022


Scientific and scholarly articles about UFOs


The ufological world was all agog recently when it was announced that an article about UFOs was being published in a peer-reviewed academic journal.

Amazing! Remarkable! Notable! Unprecedented!

Uh - no.

Despite what you may have heard from skeptics and believers alike, science has taken the subject of UFOs seriously on many, many occasions. Dozens of scholarly and academic articles have appeared in peer-reviewed journals all along, with apparently little notice or interest.

Admittedly, many of these articles looked at ufology in a less than positive light, but a considerable number regarded the subject quite seriously and as a topic of scientific curiosity, if not interest and with relevance to many scientific realms.

I started working on a list of academic articles about UFOs some time ago, and I dusted it off (virtually) when the interest in the recent scientific article manifested.

A number of people have created lists of these articles over the years, including most notably Barry Greenwood's "Union Catalog" of UFO articles. Isaac Koi has a very good list of academic journal articles, and I have added to my own list from his excellent resource.

The following is my list, which is as complete as I could get at this time. I have provided links to online versions of the articles whenever possible, although some links will require institutional memberships to view the articles in full. 

The list is for articles about UFOs, but you will note that I have included some articles on UFO-ish phenomena as well, with discretion.

Also, the list does not include book reviews, editorial comments, news briefs and incidental notes, although I allowed a few in the list for their significance. So, while references to things in major journals such as Nature and Science could have been included dozens and dozens of times, these were not really "peer-reviewed academic or scholarly articles."

Oh, and I did not include articles from the Journal of Scientific Exploration nor the Journal of UFO Studies. While certainly peer-reviewed, these journals are not in the scientific mainstream community, and I wanted to create a list that showed that scientists outside of the ufology community have published such articles.

I used APA style, with a slight modification here and there for consistency. (I know there are many punctuation typos, so I'm working on that.) I also need to italicize the journal titles.

And yes, I am sure I missed some. This page will be updated as more articles are brought to my attention, and as future articles are published. (Which they certainly will be.)

Many thanks to Isaac for his work and assistance in this effort.

Top UFO-related articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals



Appelle, S. (1971). On a behavioral explanation of UFO sightings. Perceptual and motor skills, 32(3), 994.


Ashworth, C. E. (1980). Flying saucers, spoon-bending and Atlantis: A structural analysis of new mythologies. The Sociological Review, 28(2), 353-376.


Bader, C. D. (1995). The UFO contact movement from the 1950s to the present. Studies in Popular Culture, 17(2), 73-90.


Bader, C. D. (2003). Supernatural support groups: Who are the UFO abductees and ritual-abuse survivors? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(4), 669–678.


Balch, Robert W. and Taylor, David. (1977). Seekers and saucers: The role of the cultic milieu in joining a UFO cult. American Behavioral Scientist, 20(6), pp. 839–860.


Banaji, M. R., and Kihlstrom, J. F. (1996). The ordinary nature of alien abduction memories. Psychological Inquiry, 7(2), 132-135.


Bartholomew, R. E. (1991). The quest for transcendence: An ethnography of UFOs in America. Anthropology of Consciousness, 2(1‐2), 1-12.


Biasco, F., and Nunn, K. (2000). College students' attitudes toward UFOs. College Student Journal, 34(1), 96-100.


Bisson C, and Persinger M.A. (1993). Geophysical variables and behavior: LXXV. Possible increased incidence of brain tumors following an episode of luminous phenomena. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77(3_suppl), 1088-1090.


Bowers, K. S., and Eastwood, J. D. (1996). On the edge of science: Coping with UFOlogy scientifically. Psychological Inquiry, 7(2), 136-140.


Bridgstock, M. (1982). A sociological approach to fraud in science. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 18(3), 364-383.


Bullard, T. E. (1989). UFO abduction reports: the supernatural kidnap narrative returns in technological guise. Journal of American Folklore, 147-170.


Callahan, P. S., & Mankin, R. W. (1978). Insects as unidentified flying objects. Applied optics, 17(21), 3355-3360.


Chequers, J., Joseph, S., and Diduca, D. (1997). Belief in extraterrestrial life, UFO-related beliefs, and schizotypal personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(3), 519-521.


Clamar, A. (1988). Is it time for psychology to take UFOs seriously? Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 6(3), 143-149.


Clamar, A. (1988). Symposium: The UFO experience: What psychotherapy tells us. Introduction, in: Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 6:3, 141-142


Clancy, S. A., et. al. (2002). Memory distortion in people reporting abduction by aliens. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(3), 455.


Clark, S. E., and Loftus, E. F. (1996). The construction of space alien abduction memories. Psychological Inquiry, 7(2), 140-143.


Cole, G. H. A. (1996). Thoughts on extraterrestrials prompted by two contributions in a recent issue of Quarterly Journal. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 37, 257.


Condon, E. U. (1969). UFOs I have loved and lost. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 25(10), 6-8.


Cook, C. M., and Persinger, M. A. (2001). Geophysical variables and behavior: XCII. Experimental elicitation of the experience of a sentient being by right hemispheric, weak magnetic fields: interaction with temporal lobe sensitivity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92(2), 447-448.


Cross, A. (2004). The flexibility of scientific rhetoric: A case study of UFO researchers. Qualitative Sociology, 27(1), 3-34.


Crowe, R. A., and Miura, C. K. (1995). Challenging pseudoscientific beliefs: Surveying evidence for exotic claims. Psychological reports, 77(3_suppl), 1263-1282.


Crumbaugh, J. C. (1959). ESP and flying saucers: A challenge to parapsychologists. American Psychologist, 14(9), 604–606.


Curtis, E. (2016). Science and technology in Elijah Muhammad’s Nation of Islam astrophysical disaster, genetic engineering, UFOs, white apocalypse, and black resurrection. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 20(1), 5–31.


Davis, Lorraine. (1988). A Comparison of UFO and Near-Death Experiences as Vehicles for the Evolution of Human Consciousness. Journal of Near-Death Studies, 6(4), 240-257.


Derr J.S, and Persinger M.A. (1993). Geophysical variables and behavior: LXXVI. Seasonal hydrological load and regional luminous phenomena (UFO reports) within river systems, the Mississippi Valley test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77(3_suppl), 1163-1170.


Devereux, P., McCartney, P. and Robins, D. (1983). Bringing UFOs down to earth. New Scientist, (1 September), 627-630.


Dewan, W. J. (2006). " A saucerful of secrets": an interdisciplinary analysis of UFO experiences. Journal of American Folklore, 184-202.


Dodd, A. (2018). Strategic ignorance and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence: Critiquing the discursive segregation of UFOs from scientific inquiry. Astropolitics, 16(1), 75-95.


Eghigian, G. (2014). ‘A transatlantic buzz’: flying saucers, extraterrestrials and America in postwar Germany. Journal of transatlantic studies, 12(3), 282-303.


Eghigian, G. (2014). The psychiatrist, the aliens, and" going native". Psychiatric Times, 31(11), 10-10.


Eghigian, G. (2015). Making UFOs make sense: Ufology, science, and the history of their mutual mistrust. Public understanding of science, [2017], 26(5), 612–626.


Escola-Gascon, Alex, O’Neill, Mary, and Gallifa, Josep. (2021). Beliefs and opinions about the existence of life outside the earth: The UFO Experiences Questionnaire (UFO-Q). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100124.


Espírito Santo, D., and Vergara, A. (2020). The possible and the impossible: reflections on evidence in Chilean ufology. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología, (41), 125-146.


Forrest, D. V. (2008). Alien abduction: A medical hypothesis. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 36(3), 431-442.


Fournier, N. M., and Persinger, M. A. (2004). Geophysical variables and behavior: C. Increased geomagnetic activity on days of commercial air crashes attributed to computer or pilot error but not mechanical failure. Perceptual and motor skills, 98(3_suppl), 1219-1224.


Freitas Jr, R. A., & Valdes, F. (1980). A search for natural or artificial objects located at the Earth-Moon libration points. Icarus, 42(3), 442-447.


Fuller, B.A.G. (1952). Flying saucers. The Journal of Philosophy. 49(17), Aug. 14, 1952, 545-559.


Gamboa, M. (2021). Spiritual pilgrimages and UFO tourism in Uruguay: the case of La Aurora's cattle ranch. International Journal of Tourism Anthropology, 8(2), 162-178.


Geppert, A. (2012). Extraterrestrial encounters: UFOs, science and the quest for transcendence, 1947–1972. History and Technology: An International Journal, 28(3), 335-362.


Ghidina, M. J. (2019). Finding God in grain: Crop circles, rationality, and the construction of spiritual experience. Symbolic Interaction, 42(2), 278-300.


Grassi, F., Cocheo, C., and Russo, P. (2005). Balls of light: The questionable science of crop circles. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 19(2), 159-170.


Gray, R. H. (2015). The Fermi paradox is neither Fermi’s nor a paradox. Astrobiology, 15(3), 195-199.


Greenwood, B., and Davidson-Arnott, R. G. (2020). Tidal monitoring of a barrier breach: The mysterious case of the unidentified flying object (UFO). Journal of Coastal Research, 101(sp1), 56-61.


Haines, G.K. (1999). CIA’s role in the study of UFOs, 1947–90: A die‐hard issue. Intelligence and National Security, 14(2), 26-48.


Hall, R. L. (1996). Escaping the self or escaping the anomaly? Psychological inquiry, 7(2), 143-148.


Haselhoff, E. H. (2001). Opinions and comments on Levengood WC, Talbott NP (1999). Dispersion of energies in worldwide crop formations. Physiologia plantarum, 111, 123–125.


Hauge, B, (2010). Investigation and analysis of transient luminous phenomena in the low atmosphere of Hessdalen valley, Norway. Acta Astronautica, 67(11–12), 1443-1450.


Hayes, M., and Morritt, N. (2020). Michael W. Burke-Gaffney and the UFO debate in Atlantic Canada, 1947-1969. Scientia Canadensis: Canadian Journal of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine/Scientia Canadensis: revue canadienne d'histoire des sciences, des techniques et de la médecine, 42(1), 54-74.


Hedervari, P. (1982). Luminous phenomena and other particular events before, during and after earthquakes in the Carpathian Basin. EOS, 63(51), 1258.


Holden, K. J., and French, C. C. (2002). Alien abduction experiences: Some clues from neuropsychology and neuropsychiatry. Cognitive neuropsychiatry, 7(3), 163-178.


Horstemeier, R. (2006). Flying saucers are real! The US Navy, unidentified flying objects, and the national security state. Socialism and Democracy, 20(3), 187-216.


Houran, J. (1997). Tolerance of ambiguity and the perception of UFOs. Perceptual and motor skills, 85(3), 973-974.


Hughes, F. (1967). A trained eye on UFO’s. Science, 156(3780), 1311-1312.


Hull, J. G. (1996). When explanations fail: Science and pseudoscience in psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 7(2), 149-151.


Hunter, J. (2021). Deep weird: High strangeness, boggle thresholds and damned data in academic research on extraordinary experience. Journal for the Study of Religious Experience, 7(1), 5-18.


Hutchison, P. and Strentz, H. (2019). Journalism versus the flying saucers: Assessing the first generation of UFO reportage, 1947–1967. American Journalism, 36(2), 150-170.


Hynek, J.A. (1981). The UFO phenomenon: Laugh, laugh, study, study. Technology Review, July 1981, pp. 50-58.


Jellinek, M., Fisman, S. and Fisman, R. (1999). Cultural influences on symptom presentation in childhood. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38 (6), 782-783.


Johnson, D. M. (1945). The" phantom anesthetist" of Mattoon: A field study of mass hysteria. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 40(2), 175.

Johnson, H. and R. Holle. (1969). Observations and comments on two simultaneous cloud holes over Miami. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 50, 157-161.


Jones, RV. (1968). The natural philosophy of flying saucers. Physics Bulletin, 19(7), 225


Karbovnik, D. (2020). Conspiracy theories and UFOs. Diogenes, 62(3), 1-9.


Keel, J. A. (1975). The flying saucer subculture. Journal of Popular Culture, 8(4), 871.


King, L. A., et al. (2007). Ghosts, UFOs, and magic: Positive affect and the experiential system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 905–919.


Krasnoholovets, V., and Gandzha, I. (2012). A sub microscopic description of the formation of crop circles. Chaotic modeling and simulation, 2, 323-335.


Kuiper, T. B. H. (1979). On scientific reasoning. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 20, 477.


Lamberg, L. (1997). Belief in alien UFOs deep in American psyche. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(3), 193.


Lamberg, L. (1997). Psychiatrist Explores Apocalyptic Violence in Heaven's Gate and Aum Shinrikyo Cults. JAMA, 278(3):191–193.


Lehn, W. (1980). On the sighting of distant unidentified objects. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 42 (5), 471-473, 475


Levengood, W.C. (1994). Anatomical anomalies in crop formation plants. Physiologia Plantarum, 92(2), 356-363.


Levengood, W. C. and Talbott, N. P. (1999). Dispersion of energies in worldwide crop formations. Physiologia Plantarum, 105, 615–624.


Littig, L. W. (1971). Affiliation motivation and belief in extraterrestrial UFOs. The Journal of Social Psychology, 83(2), 307-308.


Little, G. L. (1984). Educational level and primary beliefs about unidentified flying objects held by recognized ufologists. Psychological reports, 54(3), 907-910.


Little, Gregory. L. (1987). Geophysical variables and behavior: XLV. Review of criticisms of tectonic strain hypothesis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65(1), 203-206.


Lynn, S. J., and Kirsch, I. I. (1996). Alleged alien abductions: False memories, hypnosis, and fantasy proneness. Psychological Inquiry, 7(2), 151-155.


Maccabee, B. S. (1979). Photometric properties of an unidentified bright object seen off the coast of New Zealand. Applied Optics, 18(15), 2527-2528.


Margolis, H. (1967). The UFO phenomenon. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 23(6), 40-42.


Markowitz, W. (1967). The physics and metaphysics of unidentified flying objects: Reported UFO's cannot be under extraterrestrial control if the laws of physics are valid. Science, 157(3794), 1274-1279.


Marsching, J. D. (2003). Orbs, blobs, and glows: Astronauts, UFOs, and photography. Art Journal, 62(3), 56-65.


McLeod, C. C., Corbisier, B., and Mack, J. E. (1996). A more parsimonious explanation for UFO abduction. Psychological Inquiry, 7(2), 156-168.


McNally, Richard J. (2012). Explaining “memories” of space alien abduction and past lives: An experimental psychopathology approach. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 3(1): 2-16.


Meerloo, J. (1968). The flying saucer syndrome and the need for miracles. Journal of the American Medical Association, 203(12), 1074.


Mencken, F. C., Bader, C. D., & Kim, Y. J. (2009). Round trip to hell in a flying saucer: The relationship between conventional Christian and paranormal beliefs in the United States. Sociology of Religion, 70(1), 65–85.


Miller, J. (1953). On flying saucers and other “unusual” aerial objects. School science and mathematics, 53(9), 716.


Millman, P. M. (1975). Seven maxims of UFO: A scientific approach. Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, 69, 175.


Musgrave, J. B., and Houran, J. (2000). Flight and abduction in witchcraft and UFO lore. Psychological reports, 86(2), 669-688.


Neagoe, A. D. (2000). Abducted by aliens: a case study. Psychiatry, 63(2), 202-207.


Newman, L. (1997). Intergalactic hostages: People who report abduction by UFOs. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16(2), 151–177.


Newman, L. S., and Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Not just another false memory: Further thoughts on the UFO abduction phenomenon. Psychological Inquiry, 7(2), 185-197.


Newman, L. S., and Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Toward an explanation of the UFO abduction phenomenon: Hypnotic elaboration, extraterrestrial sadomasochism, and spurious memories. Psychological Inquiry, 7(2), 99-126.


Nolan, G.P., Vallee, J.F., Jiang, S., and Lemke, L.G. (2022). Improved instrumental techniques, including isotopic analysis, applicable to the characterization of unusual materials with potential relevance to aerospace forensics. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 128.


Norman, M. (2017). How UFOs conquered the world: The history of a modern myth. Folklore, 128(1), 106-107.


Otgaar, H., et al. (2009). Abducted by a UFO: Prevalence information affects young children’s false memories for an implausible event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 115–125.


Otis, L. (1979). Selective exposure to the film Close Encounters. The Journal of Psychology, 101(2), 293-295.


Paiva, G. and Taft, C. (2010). A hypothetical dusty plasma mechanism of Hessdalen lights. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 72, no. 16, 1200-1203.


Paiva, G. and Taft, C. (2012). Cluster formation in Hessdalen lights. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 80, 336-229.


Paiva, G. and Taft, C. (2022). A mechanism to explain the spectrum of Hessdalen Lights phenomenon. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 117, 1–4.


Parnell, J. (1988). Measured personality characteristics of persons who claim UFO experiences. Psychotherapy in private practice, 6(3), 159-165.


Partridge, C. (2004). Alien demonology: the Christian roots of the malevolent extraterrestrial in UFO religions and abduction spiritualities. Religion, 34, 163-189.


Patry, A. L., and Pelletier, L. G. (2001). Extraterrestrial beliefs and experiences: An application of the theory of reasoned action. The journal of social psychology, 141(2), 199-217.


Persinger M. and Derr, J. (2013). Luminous shapes with unusual motions as potential predictors of earthquakes: A historical summary of the validity and application of the tectonic strain theory. International Journal of Geosciences, 4(2), 387-396.


Persinger M.A, and Derr J.S. (1985). Geophysical variables and behavior: XXIII. Relations between UFO Reports within the Uinta Basin and Local Seismicity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60(1):59-77.


Persinger M.A, and Derr J.S. (1985). Geophysical variables and behavior: XXXII. Evaluations of UFO reports in an area of infrequent seismicity: The Carman, Manitoba episode. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61(3):807-813.


Persinger M.A, and Derr J.S. (1990). Geophysical variables and behavior: LXI. UFO reports in Carman, Manitoba, and the 1975 Minnesota quake: Evidence of triggering by increased volume of the Red River. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71(2):531-536.


Persinger M.A, and Derr J.S. (1990). Geophysical variables and behavior: LXII. temporal coupling of UFO reports and seismic energy release within the Rio Grande rift system: Discriminative validity of the tectonic strain theory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71(2):52-53.


Persinger M.A, and Derr J.S. (1993). Geophysical variables and behavior: LXXIV. Man-made fluid injections into the crust and reports of luminous phenomena (UFO reports)—Is the strain field an aseismically propagating hydrological pulse? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77(3_suppl), 1059-1065.


Persinger, M.A. (1984). Prediction of historical and contemporary luminosity (UFO) reports by seismic variables within Western Europe. Experientia, 40, 676–681.


Persinger M.A. (1981).Geophysical variables and behavior: III. Prediction of UFO reports by geomagnetic and seismic activity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 53(1):115-122.


Persinger M.A. (1983). Geophysical variables and behavior: IX. Expected clinical consequences of close proximity to UFO-related luminosities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56(1):259-265.


Persinger M.A. (1983). Geophysical variables and behavior: VII. Prediction of recent European UFO report years by nineteenth century luminosity and solar-seismic measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56(1):91-95.


Persinger M.A. (1983). Geophysical variables and human behavior: VIII. Specific prediction of UFO reports within the New Madrid states by solar-geomagnetic and seismic measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56(1):243-249.


Persinger M.A. (1983). Geophysical variables and human behavior: XV. Tectonic strain luminosities (UFO reports) as predictable but hidden events within pre-1947 Central U.S.A. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57(3_suppl):1227-1234.


Persinger M.A. (1984). Geophysical variables and human behavior: XVIII. Expected perceptual characteristics and local distributions of close UFO reports. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58(3):951-959.


Persinger M.A. (1985). Geophysical variables and behavior: XXI. Geomagnetic variation as possible enhancement stimuli for UFO reports preceding earthtremors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60(1):37-38.


Persinger M.A. (1985). Geophysical variables and behavior: XXII. The tectonogenic strain continuum of unusual events. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60(1):59-65.


Persinger M.A. (1988). Geophysical variables and behavior: LIII. Epidemiological considerations for incidence of cancer and depression in areas of frequent UFO reports. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67(3):799-803.


Persinger M.A. (1993). Paranormal and religious beliefs may be mediated differentially by subcortical and cortical phenomenological processes of the temporal (limbic) lobes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76(1), 247-251.


Persinger, M. (1976). Transient geophysical bases for ostensible UFO-related phenomena and associated verbal behavior? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43(1), 215.


Persinger, M. (1982). Geophysical variables and behavior: IV. UFO reports and Fortean phenomena: Temporal correlations in the central USA. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 54(1), 299-302.


Persinger, M. A. (1980). Earthquake activity and antecedent UFO report numbers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50(3, Pt 1), 791–797.


Persinger, M. A. (2001). Geophysical variables and behavior: XC. What people consider strange: change in proportions of reports of Fortean phenomena over time. Psychological reports, 88(1), 89-90.


Persinger, M. A. (2001). The neuropsychiatry of paranormal experiences. The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 13(4), 515-524.


Persinger, M. A., and Derr, J. S. (1984). Geophysical variables and human behavior: XIX. Strong temporal relationships between inclusive seismic measures and UFO reports within Washington state. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59(2), 551-566.           


Persinger, M.A. (1985). Geophysical variables and behavior: XXVI. A response to Rutkowski’s critique of the tectonic strain hypothesis for UFO phenomena. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60(2), 575-582.


Persinger. M.A. (1983). Religious and mystical experiences as artifacts of temporal lobe function: a general hypothesis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 1255-1262.


Petrescu, R. et al. (2017). What is a UFO? Journal of Aircraft and Spacecraft Technology, 1(2), 80-90.


Pierre, L. S., and Persinger, M. A. (2006). Experimental facilitation of the sensed presence is predicted by the specific patterns of the applied magnetic fields, not by suggestibility: re-analyses of 19 experiments. International Journal of Neuroscience, 116(19), 1079-1096.


Platov, Y. V., and Sokolov, B. A. (2000). The study of Unidentified Flying Objects in the Soviet Union. Herald-Russian Academy of Sciences / Vestnik-Rossiiskaia Akademiia Nauk, 70(3), 244-251.


Post, M. (1980). UFOs. Christianity and literature. 29(4), 2.


Powers, W. (1967).  Analysis of UFO reports. Science, 156 (3771), 11.


Raduga, M., Shashkov, A., and Zhunusova, Z. (2021). Emulating alien and UFO encounters in REM sleep. International Journal of Dream Research, 247-256.


Ramet, S. (1998). UFOs over Russia and Eastern Europe. Journal of popular culture, 32(3), 81-99.


Ross, M., and Newby, I. R. (1996). Distinguishing memory from fantasy. Psychological Inquiry, 7(2), 173-177.


Rothstein, M. (1997). The family, Ufos and god: A modern extension of Christian mythology. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 12(3), 353-362.


Rutkowski C.A. (1984). Geophysical variables and human behavior: XVI. Some criticisms. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58(3):840-842.


Rutkowski, C. (1981). What is happening on the moon? Lunar Transient Phenomena. Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, 75, 237-241.


Rutkowski, C. A., & Del Bigio, M. R. (1989). UFOs and cancer? CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal, 140(11), 1258.


Rutkowski, Chris A. (1986). Geophysical variables and behavior: XXXIV. Further comments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63(1), 18.


Saethre, E. (2007). Close encounters: UFO beliefs in a remote Australian Aboriginal community. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, (N.S.) 13, 901-915.


Saethre, E. (2007). UFOs, otherness, and belonging: Identity in remote Aboriginal Australia. Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 13(2), 217-233.


Sagan, C. (1963). Direct contact among galactic civilizations by relativistic interstellar spaceflight. Planetary and Space Science, 11(5), 485-498.


Salisbury, F. (1967). The scientist and the UFO. BioScience, 17(1), January 1967, 15–24.


Sanarov, V. (1981). On the nature and origin of flying saucers and little green men. Current anthropology, 22(2), 163–167.


Sandels, R. (1986). UFOs, science fiction and the postwar utopia. Journal of Popular Culture, 20 (1), 141-151.


Saunders D.R, and Van Arsdale P. Ii. Points of view about UFOs: A multidimensional scaling study. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1968;27(3_suppl):1219-1238


Saunders D.R. I. Factor analysis of UFO-related attitudes. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1968;27(3_suppl):1207-1218.


Schwarz, B. (1976). UFO contactee Stella Lansing: possible medical implications of her motion picture experiments. The Journal of the American Society of Psychosomatic Dentistry and Medicine, 23(2), 60-8.


Schwarz, B. (1979). A UFO motion picture experiment (at Betty Hill's "landing field"). The Journal of the American Society of Psychosomatic Dentistry and Medicine, 26(2), 73-81.


Scott, I. (1987). Survey of unidentified aerial phenomenon reports in Delaware County, Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science, 87(1), 24-27.

Sentes, B. and Palmer, S. (2000). Presumed immanent: The Raëlians, UFO religions, and the postmodern condition. Nova Religio, 4(1), 86-105.

Sharples, J. (2016). Sky and stardust: The flying saucer in American popular culture, 1947–1957. Cultural and Social History, 13(1), 81-98.


Sheldon-Duplaix, A. (2020). Phénomènes aérospatiaux non identifiés: Changement de paradigme ? DSI (Défense et Sécurité Internationale), 146, 96–103.


Shermer, M. (2011). UFOs, UAPs and CRAPs. Scientific American, 304(4), 90.


Silagadze, Z. K. (2003). Tunguska genetic anomaly and electrophonic meteors. Astrophysics, Acta Phys.Polon. B36 (2005) 935. arXiv preprint astro-ph/0311337.


Simon, A. (1976). UFOC: Testing for the existence of Air Force censorship. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 13(1), 3–5.


Spanos, N. P., Cross, P. A., Dickson, K., & DuBreuil, S. C. (1993). Close encounters: An examination of UFO experiences. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(4), 624.


Spanos, Nicholas P., Burgess, Cheryl A. and Burgess, Melissa Faith. (1994). Past-life identities, UFO abductions, and satanic ritual abuse: The Social Construction of Memories. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42 (4), 433-446.


Sparks, Glenn G., Pellechia, Marianne, and Irvine, Chris. (1998). Does television news about UFOs affect viewers’ UFO beliefs?: An experimental investigation. Communication Quarterly. 46 (3), 284-294.


Spence, D. P. (1996). Abduction tales as metaphors. Psychological Inquiry, 7(2), 177-179.


Sprinkle, R. L. (1988). Psychotherapeutic services for persons who claim UFO experiences. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 6(3), 151-157.


Stahl, P. A. (1980). Transient optical phenomena of the atmosphere: A case study. Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, 74, 168.


Stothers, R. (2007). Unidentified flying objects in classical antiquity. The Classical Journal, 103(1), 79–92.


Strube, M. J. (1996). The truth is out there. Psychological Inquiry, 7(2), 180-184.


Stupple, D. and Dashti, A. (1977). Flying saucers and multiple realities: A case study in phenomenological theory. Journal of popular culture, 11(2), 479-493.


Suess, L. A. H., and Persinger, M. A. (2001). Geophysical variables and behavior: XCVI.“Experiences” attributed to Christ and Mary at Marmora, Ontario, Canada, may have been consequences of environmental electromagnetic stimulation: implications for religious movements. Perceptual and motor skills, 93(2), 435-450.


Tipler, F. J. (1980). Extraterrestrial intelligent beings do not exist. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 21, 267-281.


Tromly, L. (2017). Race, citizenship, and the politics of alien abduction; Or, Why aliens do not abduct Asian Americans. The Journal of Popular Culture, 50(2), 276-292.


Tumminia, D. (1998). How prophecy never fails: Interpretive reason in a flying-saucer group. Sociology of Religion, 59(2), 157-170.


Twemlow, S. W. (1994). Misidentified flying objects? An integrated psychodynamic perspective on near-death experiences and UFO abductions. Journal of Near Death Studies, 12, 205-205.


Warren, D. I. (1970). Status inconsistency theory and flying saucer sightings. Science, 170(3958), 599-603.

Wendt, A. and Duvall, R. (2008). Sovereignty and the UFO. Political Theory, 36(4), 607-633.


Wertheimer M. A case of “autostasis” or reverse autokinesis. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1968;26(2):417-418.


Westrum, R. (1977). Social intelligence about anomalies: The case of UFOs. Social Studies of Science, 7(3), 271-302.


Wichman, H. (1971). A scientist in the cockpit: The case history and analysis of a UFO sighting. Space Life Sciences, 3(2), 165–170.


Wright, D.W.M. (2020). Encountering UFOs and aliens in the tourism industry. Journal of Tourism Futures, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.


Zeller, B. (2011). At the nexus of science and religion: UFO religions. Religion Compass, 5(11), 666-674.


Zeller, B. E. (2021). (Dis) Enchanted ufology: The boundaries of science and religion in MUFON, the Mutual UFO Network. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 25(2), 61-86.


Ziegler, C.A. (1999). UFOs and the US intelligence community. Intelligence and National Security, 14(2), 1-25.


Zimmer, T. A. (1984). Social psychological correlates of possible UFO sightings. Journal of Social Psychology, 123(2), 199.


Zimmer, T. A. (1985). Belief in UFOs as alternative reality, cultural rejection or disturbed psyche. Deviant Behavior, 6(4), 405-419.



This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?